Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
QJM ; 2022 Sep 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2243544

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe the demographic and clinical profile and ascertain the determinants of outcome among hospitalised COVID-19 adult patients enrolled in the National Clinical Registry for COVID-19 (NCRC). METHODS: NCRC is an on-going data collection platform operational in 42 hospitals across India. Data of hospitalized COVID-19 patients enrolled in NCRC between 1st September 2020 to 26th October 2021 were examined. RESULTS: Analysis of 29,509 hospitalised, adult COVID-19 patients [mean (SD) age: 51.1 (16.2) year; male: 18752 (63.6%)] showed that 15678 (53.1%) had at least one comorbidity. Among 25715 (87.1%) symptomatic patients, fever was the commonest symptom (72.3%) followed by shortness of breath (48.9%) and dry cough (45.5%). In-hospital mortality was 14.5% (n = 3957). Adjusted odds of dying were significantly higher in age-group ≥60 years, males, with diabetes, chronic kidney diseases, chronic liver disease, malignancy, and tuberculosis, presenting with dyspnea and neurological symptoms. WHO ordinal scale 4 or above at admission carried the highest odds of dying [5.6 (95% CI: 4.6, 7.0)]. Patients receiving one [OR: 0.5 (95% CI: 0.4, 0.7)] or two doses of anti-SARS CoV-2 vaccine [OR: 0.4 (95% CI: 0.3, 0.7)] were protected from in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: WHO ordinal scale at admission is the most important independent predictor for in-hospital death in COVID-19 patients. Anti-SARS-CoV2 vaccination provides significant protection against mortality.

2.
Indian J Med Res ; 155(5&6): 478-484, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1988205

ABSTRACT

Background & objectives: Data from the National Clinical Registry for COVID-19 (NCRC) were analyzed with an aim to describe the clinical characteristics, course and outcomes of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the third wave of the pandemic and compare them with patients admitted earlier. Methods: The NCRC, launched in September 2020, is a multicentre observational initiative, which provided the platform for the current investigation. Demographic, clinical, treatment and outcome data of hospitalized COVID-19 patients were captured in an electronic data portal from 38 hospitals across India. Patients enrolled during December 16, 2021 to January 17, 2022 were considered representative of the third wave of COVID-19 and compared with those registered during November 15 to December 15, 2021, representative of the tail end of the second wave. Results: Between November 15, 2021 and January 17, 2022, 3230 patients were recruited in NCRC. Patients admitted in the third wave were significantly younger than those admitted earlier (46.7±20.5 vs. 54.6±18 yr). The patients admitted in the third wave had a lower requirement of drugs including steroids, interleukin (IL)-6 inhibitors and remdesivir as well as lower oxygen supplementation and mechanical ventilation. They had improved hospital outcomes with significantly lower in-hospital mortality (11.2 vs. 15.1%). The outcomes were better among the fully vaccinated when compared to the unvaccinated or partially vaccinated. Interpretation & conclusions: The pattern of illness and outcomes were observed to be different in the third wave compared to the last wave. Hospitalized patients were younger with fewer comorbidities, decreased symptoms and improved outcomes, with fully vaccinated patients faring better than the unvaccinated and partially vaccinated ones.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza, Human , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Pandemics , Hospitalization , Registries
3.
Talanta ; 252: 123809, 2023 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1984105

ABSTRACT

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) such as quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) or isothermal NAATs (iNAATs) such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) require pure nucleic acid free of any polymerase inhibitors as its substrate. This in turn, warrants the use of spin-column mediated extraction with centralized high-speed centrifuges. Additionally, the utilization of centralized real-time fluorescence readout and TaqMan-like molecular probes in qRT-PCR and real-time LAMP add cost and restrict their deployment. To circumvent these disadvantages, we report a novel sample-to-answer workflow comprising an indirect sequence-specific magneto-extraction (also referred to as magnetocapture, magneto-preconcentration, or magneto-enrichment) for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid. It was followed by in situ fluorescence or electrochemical LAMP. After in silico validation of the approach's sequence selectivity against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, the comparative performance of indirect and direct magnetocapture in detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in the presence of excess host nucleic acid or serum was probed. After proven superior, the sensitivity of the indirect sequence-specific magnetocapture in conjunction with electrochemical LAMP was investigated. In each case, its sensitivity was assessed through the detection of clinically relevant 102 and 103 copies of target nucleic acid. Overall, a highly specific nucleic acid detection method was established that can be accommodated for either centralized real-time SYBR-based fluorescence LAMP or portable electrochemical LAMP.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , COVID-19/diagnosis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , RNA, Viral/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL